INSTITUTIONAL PARTNERSHIPS
Connect clinical knowledge, research methods and engineering to answer a defined question. Begin with one project; build a longer relationship when the work calls for it.
CHOOSE YOUR CONTEXT
Select your organization to explore a possible scope, useful starting inputs and relevant work.
Governments & public agencies
Investigate geographic access, workforce distribution or service capacity. Connect a planning question with explicit methods, current local data and uncertainty.
Access maps; capacity or workforce assessment; decision brief with assumptions and limitations.
Examples for discussion; the approved scope determines deliverables, resources and timelines.
Discuss this collaboration →WAYS TO COMMISSION WORK
A concrete question makes it possible to define deliverables, the team, milestones and resources. Each proposal is quoted after feasibility review.
01
For a team with a clinical question and organized data.
Protocol or analysis plan, reproducible analysis and manuscript support within the agreed scope.
Discuss this scope →02
For hospitals or universities with several questions and limited methodological capacity.
Study prioritization, accountable leads, methodological support and coordination of agreed outputs.
Discuss this scope →03
For health authorities and innovators evaluating access, costs or performance.
Evaluation design, access or economic analysis, and a validation plan appropriate to the question.
Discuss this scope →WORK YOU CAN EXAMINE
Review relevant programmes, sources and development stages before proposing a collaboration. Programme links do not imply a partnership with your institution.
Preprints remain preliminary. Research prototypes require validation for their intended use. Individual affiliations do not establish institutional endorsement.
FROM QUESTION TO WORK
Explain the problem, intended decision and context. Keep confidential data out of the initial inquiry.
We review the question, capabilities, data and scientific, ethical and technical needs.
Define accountable leads, outputs, resources, milestones, data permissions and scientific review in writing.
The agreed team develops the work and reviews results with your institutional leads.
Data control, confidentiality, ethics, intellectual property, publication responsibilities and applicable regulated activities are defined for each project. Authorship follows contributions; journal acceptance is an independent decision.
Read the collaboration framework →YOUR FIRST CONVERSATION
For governments & public agencies:
Decision to inform, geography, population, available public or authorized data and technical counterpart.
Request a partnership discussion →Your organization type accompanies your inquiry reference. An inquiry creates no payment commitment; scope, price and timing require agreement.
This optional exercise helps prepare a discussion. It is not a formal audit or a binding recommendation.
