← Project overview

Artificial Intelligence

Fetal Ultrasound Image Segmentation and Biometric Measurements

Develop and evaluate an artificial-intelligence workflow for fetal ultrasound image segmentation and biometric measurements, using a clinically curated dataset and a prespecified reference standard. The project will prioritize clinically meaningful validation rather than model accuracy alone: internal holdout testing, class-wise performance, calibration where applicable, subgroup performance, error analysis and transparent reporting will be incorporated into the final study design. The final model architecture and validation strategy will be selected by the microscopIA engineering and data-science team after dataset audit and label-quality assessment.

Project overview

Your contribution, before you apply

Participant tasks

Scientific source text · EN

Participants will work primarily on clinically supervised data curation and quality control. • Complete project-specific annotation and adjudication training. • Label or verify images/signals according to the approved data dictionary and reference standard. • Conduct duplicate quality-control review and resolve annotation discrepancies with the assigned clinical expert. • Support literature review, dataset documentation, error taxonomy and clinically meaningful subgroup definitions. • Contribute to interpretation, manuscript drafting, revision and scientific dissemination. Programming experience is not required for participant positions. Model development and statistical processing will be conducted by the microscopIA data-science and engineering team.

Training and supervision

Scientific source text · EN

microscopIA will provide annotation manuals, calibration cases, reference-standard definitions, data-governance guidance, quality-control workflows and project-specific clinical teaching. Assigned clinicians will adjudicate uncertain labels; microscopIA data scientists and engineers will lead model development and statistical validation.

Application route

Active members: choose your membership category. External applications are available only where this project explicitly accepts them. Review the scientific brief, working language and expected commitment; selection and authorship are separate.

Choose my pathway →

AI-001 · Project brief

Is this the right project for you?

Applications close
October 31, 2026
Decision notification
November 5, 2026
Induction and training / project start
November 10, 2026
Available positions
7
Weekly commitment
5–7 hours/week, flexibly scheduled
Expected duration
Up to 5 months
Membership
Active members only
Nationality
Any nationality
Project language
English
ObstetricsMaternal–Fetal MedicineUltrasoundRadiologyArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareArtificial IntelligenceClinical DataModel Validation
Research Objectives

Develop and evaluate an artificial-intelligence workflow for fetal ultrasound image segmentation and biometric measurements, using a clinically curated dataset and a prespecified reference standard. The project will prioritize clinically meaningful validation rather than model accuracy alone: internal holdout testing, class-wise performance, calibration where applicable, subgroup performance, error analysis and transparent reporting will be incorporated into the final study design. The final model architecture and validation strategy will be selected by the microscopIA engineering and data-science team after dataset audit and label-quality assessment.

Why This Matters

This project is designed to produce decision-relevant evidence for clinical practice, health-system planning or research. Participation combines applied training, verifiable scientific work and contribution to a publication-quality manuscript.

Methods Summary

Development and validation of an AI model using a clinical reference standard, quality control, internal validation, class-wise metrics, error analysis and subgroup assessment.

Data Sources / Evidence Base

Clinically curated imaging or biomedical datasets with prespecified reference-standard labels.

Participant Responsibilities

Participants will work primarily on clinically supervised data curation and quality control. • Complete project-specific annotation and adjudication training. • Label or verify images/signals according to the approved data dictionary and reference standard. • Conduct duplicate quality-control review and resolve annotation discrepancies with the assigned clinical expert. • Support literature review, dataset documentation, error taxonomy and clinically meaningful subgroup definitions. • Contribute to interpretation, manuscript drafting, revision and scientific dissemination. Programming experience is not required for participant positions. Model development and statistical processing will be conducted by the microscopIA data-science and engineering team.

Participation Model

microscopIA is designed so participants can progress at their own pace within project deadlines. Work is primarily asynchronous and there is no fixed weekly schedule. An average commitment of 5–7 hours per week is anticipated and can be distributed flexibly. Mandatory meetings are kept to the minimum necessary. Under a self-governance model, each team may choose to meet more often when that improves coordination. The key expectation is to complete agreed tasks and deadlines to a high standard. The model is designed to remain compatible with medical school, rotations, clinical duties, call schedules and other professional responsibilities.

Learning Outcomes

Clinical data curation Quality control Interpretation of AI metrics Scientific writing

Training and Investigator Support

microscopIA will provide annotation manuals, calibration cases, reference-standard definitions, data-governance guidance, quality-control workflows and project-specific clinical teaching. Assigned clinicians will adjudicate uncertain labels; microscopIA data scientists and engineers will lead model development and statistical validation.

Expected Outputs

Expected outputs include a quality-controlled research dataset, documented annotation protocol, trained and validated AI model, error and subgroup analysis, reproducible performance tables/figures, and a manuscript intended for a PubMed-indexed journal.

Publication Pathway

Manuscript intended for submission to a PubMed-indexed journal; preprint whenever appropriate.

Eligibility Summary

Active microscopIA membership is required. Working language: English.

Ideal Candidate

Medical students, junior doctors and early-career professionals interested in Artificial Intelligence, Obstetrics, Maternal–Fetal Medicine, with attention to detail, independence and the ability to deliver high-quality work in a flexible environment.

Required Training

No programming certificate required; project-specific annotation calibration is mandatory.

Publication Fees

microscopIA will cover approved article-processing or publication fees for the anticipated manuscript. Participants will not be required to personally pay approved publication charges. Coverage is subject to the project reaching manuscript quality, compliance with the approved protocol, and submission through the microscopIA research program.

Authorship and Recognition

The project is designed to produce a substantive research record and a manuscript intended for submission to a PubMed-indexed journal. Authorship is contribution-based and follows ICMJE criteria: substantial contribution to the work, drafting or critical revision, final approval, and accountability. A preprint will be prepared whenever appropriate. Poster presentation opportunities may be assigned based on project performance and conference fit. Certificates, reference letters and other academic documents remain subject to the applicable microscopIA Membership and Project Terms.

Affiliation Policy

Each participant may declare a maximum of two institutional affiliations. Format: Department, Organization (Hospital, University, Company), City, Country.

Principal investigators and expert support

Jorge Racedo at microscopIA; External Clinicians. Senior clinician or subject-matter expert allocated by microscopIA.

Background evidence on PubMed ↗

A recruitment opening is not authorization to begin clinical work. Scientific, ethics, and data-access approvals remain project-specific.

What participation involves

Work remotely on agreed tasks with scientific supervision and project-specific training. The project brief confirms eligibility, workload, language, available places and access permissions.

Explore the scientific portfolio →

How to apply

Review the project aim, working language and expected commitment. Complete your investigator profile, then choose Students & Young Professionals or Clinicians & Investigators. Each button opens the corresponding form with this project’s code.

Apply to this project ↗

Approval and recognition

Admission does not authorize clinical intervention or access to confidential data. Before work begins, agree responsibilities, supervision, permissions, data/IP terms and contribution records. Authorship depends on qualifying work; no publication or journal acceptance is guaranteed.

Participation terms →

From application to a scientific contribution.

Join an existing microscopIA project as a research-team participant. Applying starts selection; work begins after acceptance, onboarding and agreement on your role.

  1. Your work

    The usual contribution is data extraction and verification, with project-specific training and supervision. Mapping teams also locate sources, build provider databases and geolocate care sites; AI projects may assign image annotation. The project brief takes precedence when it specifies different tasks.

  2. Our investment

    microscopIA covers all publication and execution costs of approved Join a Project work, including engineers, epidemiologists and data scientists. Participants are not asked to fund these project costs. Membership fees, where applicable, are separate.

  3. Your recognition

    Members and external participants receive project certificates for verified contributions and completed milestones. Substantial scientific contributions and sustained good performance create a pathway to authorship, subject to all authorship criteria.

Certificates, authorship and dissemination — how they work

Certificates document work, not journal acceptance

A project certificate records the verified role, contributions and completed work; it can support your CV before journal publication. It is distinct from membership certificates, reference letters and institutional academic credit, which have their own requirements.

An equitable pathway to authorship

Data acquisition alone is not sufficient. Contributors who make substantial qualifying contributions are given the opportunity to help draft or critically review the manuscript, approve the final version and accept accountability. All who meet the applicable authorship criteria should receive credit. Roles and author order are reviewed transparently using contribution records; membership and payment do not purchase authorship.

Preprints while peer review proceeds

When scientifically and ethically appropriate, the team may post a preprint before or during journal review, subject to author approval, permissions and journal policy. A preprint is preliminary and not peer reviewed; cite its actual status. Timing and journal acceptance are not guaranteed.

Presenting the team’s work

The team plans for one member to present a poster or oral contribution at a national or international congress when the findings and event are suitable. Presenter selection considers contribution, readiness and availability. Submission and acceptance depend on the congress; registration and travel funding must be confirmed separately in writing.

ICMJE · An equitable pathway to authorship ↗

This pathway covers joining an existing project. Clinician/investigator calls for proposing a case report or original study have separate input requirements, membership/nonmember rates and approved agreements. Applicants do not send patient-identifiable records or confidential datasets through initial applications.

Choose your role in this project

Two pathways. One scientific team.

Two steps to be considered

  1. 1. Submit the project application

    Choose the member or external route below, where eligible. Include the project code; use it manually if the form does not display it.

    AI-001
  2. 2. Create or update your investigator profile

    Use the same contact email. If you already have a profile, update it rather than creating a duplicate. A profile alone is not a project application.

    Create or update profile →

Scientific selection, available places and onboarding are confirmed separately. Neither step guarantees acceptance.

Project missing from the application? Request help with this code; do not select a different project. →

Up to 3 expert positions

Clinicians & Investigators

Active membership required. Contribute to results interpretation and manuscript preparation, especially the introduction and discussion. Senior authorship requires qualifying contributions, review, approval, and accountability. The same project application deadline applies.

Up to 3 expert positions

Apply as an expert clinician or investigator

Up to three expert positions may be available for active members on this project. Availability and selection are confirmed after reviewing your application.

Active membership required. Contribute to results interpretation and manuscript preparation, especially the introduction and discussion. Senior authorship requires qualifying contributions, review, approval, and accountability. The same project application deadline applies.

I understand; continue to the application ↗
Approval and recognition →