Le contenu principal vérifié de cette page est disponible en anglais. Certaines commandes ou formulaires utilisent la langue choisie. Demandez des précisions avant d’accepter des conditions. Demander des précisions

INSTITUTIONAL PARTNERSHIPS

Your health challenge. A shared scientific programme.

Connect clinical knowledge, research methods and engineering to answer a defined question. Begin with one project; build a longer relationship when the work calls for it.

CHOOSE YOUR CONTEXT

Different institutions. Specific questions.

Select your organization to explore a possible scope, useful starting inputs and relevant work.

Hospitals & health systems

Turn clinical questions into a defined study.

Combine your clinical leadership and authorized data with study design, analysis and scientific interpretation. Explore a single study before expanding to a research portfolio.

Potential deliverables

Study protocol; analysis plan; reproducible analysis and a manuscript where included in scope.

Examples for discussion; the approved scope determines deliverables, resources and timelines.

Discuss this collaboration →

WAYS TO COMMISSION WORK

Start with a scope your institution can evaluate.

A concrete question makes it possible to define deliverables, the team, milestones and resources. Each proposal is quoted after feasibility review.

01

A defined study

For a team with a clinical question and organized data.

Deliverables to agree

Protocol or analysis plan, reproducible analysis and manuscript support within the agreed scope.

Discuss this scope →

02

An institutional portfolio

For hospitals or universities with several questions and limited methodological capacity.

Deliverables to agree

Study prioritization, accountable leads, methodological support and coordination of agreed outputs.

Discuss this scope →

03

A decision or technology

For health authorities and innovators evaluating access, costs or performance.

Deliverables to agree

Evaluation design, access or economic analysis, and a validation plan appropriate to the question.

Discuss this scope →

WORK YOU CAN EXAMINE

Explore the work behind the conversation.

Review relevant programmes, sources and development stages before proposing a collaboration. Programme links do not imply a partnership with your institution.

Preprints remain preliminary. Research prototypes require validation for their intended use. Individual affiliations do not establish institutional endorsement.

FROM QUESTION TO WORK

Define the responsibilities before the research begins.

  1. 01

    Describe the need

    Explain the problem, intended decision and context. Keep confidential data out of the initial inquiry.

  2. 02

    Assess the scope together

    We review the question, capabilities, data and scientific, ethical and technical needs.

  3. 03

    Agree the programme

    Define accountable leads, outputs, resources, milestones, data permissions and scientific review in writing.

  4. 04

    Execute and review

    The agreed team develops the work and reviews results with your institutional leads.

Your institution brings context and authority. We contribute agreed scientific and technical work.

Data control, confidentiality, ethics, intellectual property, publication responsibilities and applicable regulated activities are defined for each project. Authorship follows contributions; journal acceptance is an independent decision.

Read the collaboration framework →

YOUR FIRST CONVERSATION

Bring a question. Prepare the essentials.

For hospitals & health systems:

Clinical question, study population, data readiness, institutional lead and permissions required for access.

Request a partnership discussion →

Your organization type accompanies your inquiry reference. An inquiry creates no payment commitment; scope, price and timing require agreement.

Planning a longer-term relationship? Explore your research capacity.

This optional exercise helps prepare a discussion. It is not a formal audit or a binding recommendation.

1. Which capabilities are available internally?
2. Approximate annual research volume
3. What does your institution most need?