Independent clinicians
Build a case report, case series, retrospective study, or other publication-ready project even without an institutional research office or personal data team.
For doctors · clinics · hospitals
microscopIA gives independent clinicians and facilities an integrated alternative to separately hiring epidemiology, data-science, scientific-writing, and publication specialists—from feasibility through the journal pathway.
A feasibility and governance review takes place before any project is accepted.
Collaboration models
Each engagement is scoped around scientific value, data readiness, governance, timeline, and the decision the work should inform.
Build a case report, case series, retrospective study, or other publication-ready project even without an institutional research office or personal data team.
Access rigorous epidemiology, analytics, writing, and publication management without maintaining a full internal research staff.
Use one coordinated partner instead of separately contracting epidemiologists, data scientists, writers, and publication professionals.
Create an embedded function for recurring study design, analytics, publishing, and portfolio coordination.
How collaboration works
This is not a manuscript-preparation or editing service. After the governed research package is approved, microscopIA leads the remaining scientific workflow while the submitter remains the clinical and data partner.
The clinical question, governed database or case, approvals, clinical context, and timely expert input.
Protocol refinement, data quality, epidemiology, clinical-data analysis, geospatial or economic analysis where relevant, tables, manuscript development, and the journal pathway.
Both teams interpret the findings, approve the final manuscript, meet authorship criteria, and respond to editors as one collaboration.
microscopIA × You publish with microscopIA
From proposal to publication
Clear decision gates protect scientific quality and align expectations.
Clarify the question, population, data source, decision need, and intended output.
Review feasibility, data quality, ethics, permissions, methods, resources, and publication potential.
Agree protocol, roles, authorship, quality controls, milestones, and journal strategy.
Conduct data management, analysis, interpretation, writing, and internal review.
Coordinate iterative improvements, reviewer responses, and sequential submission to as many as five journals.
What microscopIA provides
Clinical-research design and execution
Data-management planning and quality control
Statistical, epidemiological, economic, and geospatial analysis
Scientific writing, figures, tables, and reporting compliance
Journal selection, submission, and reviewer responses
Open-access charge planning when applicable
Bespoke scientific publishing
By request, microscopIA also supports chapter development, scientific editing, contributor coordination, and medical-book editorial workflows. Scope, schedule, and price are assessed individually.
Enquire about a book project ↗Ready-to-start gate
The eight-week timeline covers analysis, manuscript development, internal review, and submission to the agreed journal. It does not include journal peer review or acceptance.
01Complete, analysable database or case file
02Ethics committee approval or documented exemption, where applicable
03Signed institutional authorization
04Variable dictionary, clinical context, and contributor details
05Secure transfer route approved by both parties
For prospective studies, clinical trials, and community pilots, data collection must be complete and the database locked. Study design, enrolment, or implementation is scoped separately.Required authorizations
Do not upload identifiable patient data through a public form. After eligibility review, microscopIA provides a controlled transfer route.
For retrospective/prospective studies, trials, economic evaluations, and community pilots. Requires the facility research director’s signature.
Download in this language ↓Requires signatures from the treating clinician, head of the treating department, and patient or legal guardian.
Download in this language ↓Every proposed author must certify a qualifying contribution, approve the manuscript, and accept accountability before submission.
Download in this language ↓Templates support screening and must be adapted to local law and institutional policy.
Commercial clarity
The fee contributes to microscopIA team salaries, analytics, manuscript development, and the eligible article processing charge. microscopIA absorbs the remaining delivery cost. Fifty percent is due after proposal approval and 50% only after journal acceptance.
Article processing charge: article processing charge means article processing charge: a fee some journals charge for open access. Every proposal states whether one is expected and how it will be covered.
Colombia: more than 80% of submitter authors must hold Colombian affiliations and the proposal must arrive by day 10. Americas: more than 80% must hold affiliations in other countries of the Americas and the proposal must arrive by day 10. Otherwise, the international rate applies.
Compare Colombia, Americas, and international pricing ↗Authorship & editorial responsibility
Qualifying submitter authors occupy the first positions: up to five for a case report and up to eight for every other output. Each additional qualifying submitter author costs USD 150; Colombian projects are invoiced in the COP equivalent.
microscopIA reserves the final four positions for qualifying microscopIA contributors and designates the corresponding author to coordinate the editorial and publication process.
microscopIA contributors may be current network members or supervised students and professionals enrolled in its educational programmes. Payment or enrolment alone never confers authorship; every author must meet the journal’s criteria and sign the authorship declaration.
Beyond the journal
When the work supports it, microscopIA may develop, submit, and track a congress abstract. The partner covers registration, travel, and attendance; acceptance remains the congress organiser’s decision.
Before sharing data
The Trust Center explains acceptance, data handling, responsibilities, authorship, editorial control, publication costs, intellectual property, conflicts, complaints, and integrity safeguards.
Open Transparency & Governance ↗Questions institutions ask
A clear question, appropriately governed data when relevant, clinical context, approvals, and timely input. A database alone is insufficient if provenance, permissions, variables, or quality cannot be established.
No. Journals retain independent authority. The outcome-aligned payment model means the second 50% becomes due only after journal acceptance.
microscopIA reviews the decision, improves and reformats the manuscript, and may submit sequentially to as many as five appropriate journals under the agreed scope.
Ownership and permitted use depend on the source institution and written agreement. Access, processing, storage, confidentiality, and publication rights are defined before transfer.
Yes. A longer-term model can cover portfolio selection, protocols, analytics, manuscripts, publication management, and internal capacity.
Yes, by request. Chapter writing support and medical-book editing are individually scoped and priced after an editorial assessment.
Bring the question
Describe the clinical problem, available data, institutional context, and desired decision or publication outcome.